Frequently asked questions

It is an integrative therapy and wellbeing tool, educational in nature, for use by professionals in the integrative field. What it delivers is the Functional Assessment Result: a reading of how the systems appeared to be working at the moment the voice was recorded — whether slow, balanced or accelerated. It is a reading of use, not of quantity. It does not constitute a medical exam, a diagnosis or a prescription, and it does not replace assessment by a licensed health professional. The whole boundary of what we claim is set out in How it works.

The association between the voice and specific organs or systems is interpretive: today there is no peer-reviewed evidence supporting it, and we do not claim there is. What Biovoxis delivers is a record that repeats and can be compared: every report states the margin of its own data collection, so that you know what is real change and what is recording variation. The two layers — the one that is record and the one that is interpretation — appear separately, one from the other, in How it works, and a whole document is open in Sample report for you to look over before you subscribe.

From a body of technical material that circulates within the integrative field itself: the references come from that field’s own literature. It is that catalog — 1,075 items — that gives its name to every line of the report, across organs, meridians, chakras, nutrients, foods and load and exposure items, and it is what organizes the supporting material into sections you work through in the same order at every data collection. That is the interpretive layer, and it is identified as such everywhere it appears; beside it sits what is record: the score of each indicator, the comparison with the previous data collection and the margin of the collection itself. The two are kept apart in How it works.

The scale describes position relative to balance. From 1 to 2 the reading indicates hypofunction — the system appears to be working slowly; 3 tends toward deficit; from 4 to 6 is the physiological range, with 5 at the center; 7 tends toward excess; 8 and 9 indicate hyperfunction or an inflammatory picture. 5 is the balance point because it is the midpoint of a ruler of position — it is a reading of use, not of quantity, and the report itself says so to the reader at the opening of the scale section. The practical advantage is that the same ruler holds for all fourteen sections: the practitioner finds the same reading logic in every one of them and recognizes the format in every data collection that follows, which shortens the analysis in every appointment after that.

Biovoxis is a support system for integrative practice, educational and wellbeing in nature, that produces a report to be read and interpreted by you, based on biophysics and physics. In that capacity it is not a medical device, so it does not require registration or clearance from specific agencies, nor does it constitute a medical act, and it did not need to go through clinical validation — and no material of ours claims otherwise. If you ever find a text of ours suggesting something else, the error is ours: the boundary is declared in Legal notice and in How it works.

A computer with an up-to-date browser, a decent microphone and a quiet room — what most practices already have on the desk. The system guides the recording on screen and tells you the format and the length as you go, so the technical decision leaves your hands and you are left with the appointment. It runs in the browser, with no software to install. The distance of the microphone weighs more than its price: a hand’s width, and always the same across every data collection with the same person being assessed — that is what keeps the series comparable over the months.

About ten minutes inside the appointment itself: the recording is short and the rest of the time is your own reading of the report, which comes out ready right there — the supporting material enters the analysis while the appointment is still under way. People who live far away record from home: you generate a link and send it, the person being assessed opens it on a phone or a computer, accepts the consent form and submits the recording. The link is valid for 7 days and accepts up to 3 submissions, and the data collection lands straight in that person’s history — you can see someone five hundred kilometers away and still keep the record.

It will be close, with variation — and Biovoxis tells you the size of that variation, which is the point. Every report carries the minimum detectable change of that data collection: the threshold from which a difference is worth reading as real change, and not as recording variation. The report also states how much of the reading was usable. In practice, this changes the conversation in the appointment: what is worth following up is what repeats from one collection to the next, and whatever fell within the margin comes already marked as such, instead of turning into a topic. The comparison screen and the Change section put the two collections side by side, item by item — see how, in detail.

Fourteen sections, in this order: Change since the last analysis, Peak Summary, Integrative Analysis Scale, Functional Assessment Result, Inner Voice Report, Out-of-Range Indicators, Food Sensitivities, Chakras, Meridians, Organs and Systems, Muscles and Connective Tissue, Complete Nutritional Analysis, Physical and Hormonal Function and Load and Exposure Indicators — plus the block of Genetic References, which is informative and stays outside the scoring. The catalog holds 1,075 items; each report scores around 1,045 indicators when the person being assessed is male and 1,052 when female, because items of anatomy specific to one sex enter only the corresponding report. Every item comes with the score from this data collection, the score from the previous one, the direction of change and the confidence of the item — that is what lets you work through the document during the analysis and see, line by line, what has changed since last time. The counts by section and by subgroup are in The report, and a whole document is open in Sample report.

A language model writes it, called through an endpoint of Biovoxis’s own, from the scores of that data collection — the reading that would take you half an hour to write arrives ready, and that time goes back into the appointment. It is always the same 11 sections, from General Energy Profile to Integrative Recommendations, with Synthesis and Central Hypothesis immediately before; there are 6 to 8 recommendations, numbered, each one justified by the finding that prompted it. The text is written for another health professional and declares the bases it uses — integrated physiology (Guyton & Hall), the orthomolecular approach, the gut as an immune and hormonal center (Giulia Enders) and the LCHF school. Read it the way you read a working hypothesis: it is reasoning about numbers, and the decision about any course of action remains yours. Two operational points, spelled out in full: the text is generated at the moment of the collection and stays outside the database — export or print it before you leave the screen — and what goes to the model provider is name, age, biological sex, height, weight, BMI and the section scores. The recording stays out of that call, and it is not stored here either: it is discarded at the end of processing, in the same session.

It is 210 foods in 11 categories, scored on the same 1-to-9 scale as the rest of the report — a functional reading, educational in nature, for you to raise hypotheses and weigh them against the history of the person under care. The warning on this section holds in full: it is informative and it is not an allergy test, it does not identify IgE-mediated allergy and it does not replace an allergy workup conducted by a licensed professional. Food allergy is a risk condition and requires allergological assessment; prolonged food elimination based on this section alone is not a defensible course of action, all the more so in a child, a pregnant woman or someone underweight.

The system has a single input: the recording of the voice. The section organizes 363 conditions described in the literature, as reading material alongside the rest of the report — it is an informative section built on references from the integrative catalog, it is not scored and for that reason it stays outside the indicator count. The warning on this section also holds in full: no biological sample is collected, no genetic material is analyzed and no gene is sequenced; nothing there is a genetic test or genetic counseling, and nothing there should be presented to the person under care as though it were.

Sign-up is by self-declaration: you declare that you are a therapist or a professional in the integrative field, you accept the terms of use, you state your area of practice — naturopathy, orthomolecular therapy and so on — and you fill in, if you wish, the professional registration field, which is optional because a good share of integrative therapists work without a council. If you do hold a registration, your council’s rules still apply and remain your responsibility. The profile the tool was designed for is described in Who it is for, and the subscriber’s obligations are in the Terms of Use.

Biovoxis was built as professional support material: the report organizes functional information to help you make sense of the case, form working hypotheses and plan the follow-up. The interpretation, and anything conveyed to the person under care, belongs to the practitioner, who builds it from the history, the context and everything else on hand. When you judge it right to share something, the message is framed and put in context by you during the appointment, rather than left as a document for someone to interpret on their own. The natural home of the report is the file of the person under care: kept there, it becomes the record you compare the next data collection against.

The answer is the one published on this site: Biovoxis is an integrative wellbeing tool, and what the document records is the score of each indicator in that data collection, the comparison with the previous collection and the margin of the collection itself. The association between the voice and each organ is the interpretive layer, and it is identified as such. Having that distinction ready, before you are asked, is what holds the conversation up — and it is the difference between a person under care who comes back and one who disappears. It is worth sending the doctor straight to How it works, where the two layers are kept apart and set in normal-sized type.

The person under care is a record in your practice, not a user of the system: they have no login. You are the one who controls that data, as its controller; Biovoxis acts as processor, handling it on your behalf and on your instructions. In the database, isolation is row-level — each practitioner sees only their own records, because the rule lives in the database and not on the screen — and the records are held in Estados Unidos (Norte da Virgínia). About the audio, to be exact: the recording is processed to extract the frequency data and then discarded at the end of processing, in the same session — the file stays outside the database. What remains tied to the record of the person under care is the frequency data and the scores, which are still personal data: the data subject keeps their rights over it, deletion included, through support or through the data protection officer, Biovoxis (dpo@biovoxis.com) — periods, sub-processors and data subject rights are in the Privacy Policy.

It is a recurring card subscription, charged by the payment processor, in three billing periods, all of them in Brazilian reais (BRL): R$ 497.00 per month; R$ 1,974.80 every six months, which comes to R$ 329.13 per month, 34% below the monthly plan; and R$ 2,387.40 per year, equivalent to R$ 198.95 per month, 60% below twelve monthly payments. Instead of a trial period, the sample report is published in full, with the fourteen sections and the integrative reading: you know what you are buying before you pay. The methods accepted are credit card and Pix; boleto or debit card are left out. There are 7 days of right of withdrawal and 7 calendar days of grace if a charge fails, a period in which you keep working while you sort it out — the full detail is in Pricing.

You can, at any time and with no lock-in. Cancellation is done in your account dashboard, through the same channel you subscribed by, and access continues until the end of the period already paid for. Before you go, export whatever you want to keep: two CSV files — the Comprehensive Report and the Vital Report — plus printing to PDF through the browser, remembering that the AI text is generated at the moment of the collection and stays outside the database. After closure the data follows the retention policy (30 dias), and deletion can be requested from the data protection officer; the full rules are in the Terms of Use and in the Privacy Policy.